![]() After typing this, it seems obvious, but I really don’t want to give up on the marriage if there is any chance he is coming around. Over the last 11 months, I have talked with him several times to express my need for affection and that I cannot continue to live without it. However, there continues to be no affection. ![]() He has been exceptionally nice the last month. The verbal abuse has decreased considerably, although I still get an abusive remark several times a week. In the last few months, it is obvious he is trying harder. He refuses to see a counselor, saying he has a brain and knows how to use it to fix his problems. March 2005, I told him I was considering divorce and seeing a counselor. He has also been verbally abusive during our marriage. He says he loves me and shouldn’t have to repeat it, unless something changes. We have pets and he showers them with affection. For about 13 years, my husband has not shown affection to me (holding hands, sending cards, buying gifts, hugs, sitting next to me, etc.). Friedman, known for his wit and unwavering free market critique of public policy, was making a simple point: If society’s scarce resources are being used to prepare this proverbial lunch (even if it’s to orchestrate cleaner air or some other worthwhile goal), then we can be certain that some people, somewhere, are paying the bill, voluntarily or otherwise.I’ve been married 14 years. Unwavering in his support of the freedom to choose, Friedman once led a march during the Vietnam War with much younger men and women protesting the draft and calling for an all-volunteer army. It was not defense policy that motivated him as much as the cost imposed when individuals have no choice but to go off to war without being fully compensated. Eventually, of course, his message was received, and our laws were changed. Today, we have an all-volunteer military. That said, the free-lunch politics of most other issues are such that promises get our attention and, when placed in front of the people and our representatives, our approval. Through a pageant of presidents from Obama to Trump to Biden and in face of economic difficulties, we the people have been promised and have received subsidies and checks from the federal government that entered our bank accounts as if by magic.Īt the same time, we were promised that only higher income individuals would face tax increases to help pay for the checks. But now, with all that extra cash circulating, every American is facing 8 percent or higher inflation, no matter what their income level. ![]() No amount of planning and promising could negate Friedman’s rule, and the bill for the free lunch hits most of us each time we go shopping. Of course, political promises that sound like free lunches come in many forms. During the Trump administration, animosity toward China regarding respect for intellectual property rights and other trade matters led to the imposition of tariffs on a large variety of Chinese goods imported by the United States. The purpose, one could argue, was to provide “free” trade protection to corporate investors who were complaining about China’s abusive actions. To counter abortion ruling, shift from recriminations toward development No doubt plenty of investors had legitimate gripes, but the tariffs’ real costs were consistently downplayed by the administration. industry to counter the next global food crisisĪll along, those involved in these matters had to know that American consumers would be picking up the tab for the higher priced Chinese goods. There is no such thing as free enforcement of trade policies on unwilling partners. Animosity shows no sign letting up free#. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |